<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Virtues of Assembler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zanfar.com/2009/the-virtues-of-assembler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zanfar.com/2009/the-virtues-of-assembler/</link>
	<description>The Ramblings of an OCD Engineer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 04:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenji Yamamoto</title>
		<link>http://www.zanfar.com/2009/the-virtues-of-assembler/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenji Yamamoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zanfar.com/?p=56#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, pointers and assembler go hand in hand. Pointers are extremely valuable, especially if you are doing low level hardware or embedded code where you can&#039;t handle the overhead of pushing data structures to the stack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn't agree more, pointers and assembler go hand in hand. Pointers are extremely valuable, especially if you are doing low level hardware or embedded code where you can't handle the overhead of pushing data structures to the stack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah Shanker</title>
		<link>http://www.zanfar.com/2009/the-virtues-of-assembler/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah Shanker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zanfar.com/?p=56#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you: it wasn&#039;t until I took CS200 (Assembly &amp; Architecture) where I felt I could *actually* speak to a computer. It even made me a better high-level programmer! When you have to manage the stack manually, it&#039;s so true that you&#039;ll never forget it.


But even now that I really understand pointer arithmetic, I still really hate it and think it should be abstracted away :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you: it wasn't until I took CS200 (Assembly &amp; Architecture) where I felt I could *actually* speak to a computer. It even made me a better high-level programmer! When you have to manage the stack manually, it's so true that you'll never forget it.</p>
<p>But even now that I really understand pointer arithmetic, I still really hate it and think it should be abstracted away <img src='http://www.zanfar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

